"Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe".

Reality On Trial

0:00

-18:02

"Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe".

A podcast review of the book

Ken Pealock

May 14, 2025

Transcript

The authors of this book are physician scientist Robert Lanza and Bob Berman. They challenge the long-standing, Renaissance-era scientific paradigm that posits an independent, external physical universe existing separate from biological existence. The book argues that this model is reaching its limitations and proposes a radical shift to biocentrism, which asserts that consciousness is fundamental and that the perceived reality of space and time is constructed within the mind. The authors draw heavily on concepts from quantum physics, the fine-tuning of universal constants for life, and the subjective nature of human perception to support their claims.

Main Themes:

Primacy of Consciousness: The central tenet of biocentrism is that consciousness is not a byproduct of the physical universe but is fundamental to its existence. The universe, as we experience it, is dependent on the observer.
The Universe as a Biological Construct: The book argues that the perceived external world, including space and time, is an "inner form of animal sense" or "software that molds sensations into multidimensional objects," constructed within the brain.
Quantum Physics as Evidence for Biocentrism: Biocentrism finds significant support in the counter-intuitive findings of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding entanglement, wave-particle duality, and the role of observation in determining reality.
Subjectivity of Space and Time: Space and time are presented as conceptual tools of the mind, rather than absolute, external realities. Their perceived properties and even existence are dependent on the observer.
Fine-Tuning of the Universe: The authors point to the seemingly improbable precision of universal physical constants that allow for the existence of life as further evidence that the universe is inherently linked to biological observers.
Limitations of Language and Logic: Traditional language and logical frameworks, designed for navigating the macroscopic world, are deemed inadequate for comprehending the true nature of reality at fundamental or universal scales.
Share Reality On Trial

Most Important Ideas and Facts:

Biocentrism as a Replacement Paradigm: The book explicitly states, "This model has brought us untold insights into the nature of the universe—and countless applications that have transformed every aspect of our lives. But this model is reaching the end of its useful life and needs to be replaced with a radically differ-ent paradigm that reflects a deeper reality, one totally ignored until now." (p. 3)
The Necessity of Biological Existence for an External Universe: Biocentrism argues that "once one fully understands that there is no independent external universe outside of biological existence, the rest more or less falls into place." (p. 15)
Subjectivity of Sensory Experience (Sound, Touch, Vision): The authors use examples like the sound of a falling tree or the sensation of touch to illustrate that perceptions are not inherent properties of external objects but are created within the observer's mind. They note that a tree falling in an empty forest creates only "silent air pulses—tiny puffs of wind." (p. 19) Regarding touch, they state, "that sensation of pressure is caused not by any contact with a solid, but by the fact that every atom has negatively charged electrons in its outer shells... Nothing solid ever meets any other solids when you push on a tree." (p. 22)
The Mind as the Location of Perceived Reality: The book asserts that the visual image of an object "actually exists only inside your brain. That is its location. It is the only place visual images are perceived and cognized." (p. 35) They refute the "two worlds" model, stating, "Nothing is perceived except the perceptions themselves, and nothing exists outside of consciousness. Only one visual reality is extant, and there it is. Right there." (p. 35)
Control as an Illusion: The Benjamin Libet experiment is cited as evidence that conscious decisions are preceded by subconscious brain activity, suggesting that our sense of personal free will or control over our minds is largely an illusion. Libet concluded that "the sense of personal free will arises solely from a habitual retrospective perspective of the ongoing flow of brain events." (p. 39)
Quantum Entanglement and Non-Locality: Entanglement is presented as a key phenomenon supporting biocentrism, demonstrating a connection between particles that is not limited by space-time. The excerpt highlights how two entangled particles behave as one, "instantaneously and forever, even if they are sepa-rated by the width of galaxies." (p. 53) They further emphasize the instantaneous nature of this connection, stating, "though it doesn’t seem possible, it gets spookier still. If we now let photon y hit the slits and the measuring screen first, and a split second later measure its twin far away... The y-photon stops taking paths through both slits retroactively; the interference is gone." (p. 57) This challenges Einstein's insistence on locality.
The Role of Observation in Quantum Reality: Quantum theory is interpreted to mean that particles do not have definite properties or locations until they are observed. "With small discrete particles, however, if they are not being observed, they cannot be thought of as having any real existence—either duration or a position in space. Until the mind sets the scaf-folding of an object in place... it cannot be thought of as being either here or there." (p. 55)
Quantum Behavior at Macroscopic Scales: The excerpts mention experiments with buckyballs and KHCO3 crystals as evidence that quantum phenomena, such as entanglement and superposition, are not limited to the microscopic world but extend towards the macroscopic, lending support to a biocentric view at the level of living organisms. (p. 59)
Observation Influences Reality (Quantum Zeno Effect): The NIST experiment with beryllium ions is described as demonstrating that continuous observation can prevent an atom from changing its energy state, suggesting that "the process of measurement gives the atoms “a little nudge,” forcing them back down to the lower energy state—in effect, resetting the system to zero. This behavior has no analog in the classical world of everyday sense awareness and is apparently a function of observation." (p. 78)
The Observer's Necessity in Physics: Eugene Wigner is quoted as stating that it is "not possible to formulate the laws of [physics] in a fully consistent way without reference to the consciousness [of the observer]." (p. 81)
The Anthropic Principle and the Fine-Tuning of the Universe: The book references the fine-tuning of physical constants necessary for life, citing the gravitational constant and the fine structure constant as examples. They acknowledge the critique that this could be circular reasoning, quoting philosopher John Leslie's analogy of a man surviving a firing squad: "‘Of course they all missed; that makes perfect sense, otherwise I wouldn’t be here to wonder why they all missed.’ But anyone in his or her right mind is going to want to know how such an unlikely event occurred." (p. 91)
Time as a Mental Construct: Inspired by Zeno's paradox of the arrow, the authors suggest that motion, and therefore time, is not an external reality but a product of the mind organizing "still frames" of spatial states. "time is the inner form of animal sense that animates events—the still frames—of the spatial world. The mind animates the world like the motor and gears of a projector." (p. 96) They use the metaphor of a strobe light to illustrate how time is a summation of still moments. "In quantum mechanics, “position” is like a strobe snapshot. Momentum is the life-created summation of many frames." (p. 101) They also discuss time dilation in relativity as evidence of time's subjective nature, noting that "Nothing speeding away from us can fail to appear in slow motion." (p. 102) Einstein's statement that "the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persis-tent illusion" is also included. (p. 106)
Measurement as a Human Activity: Einstein's definition of time and space based on measurement is discussed, with the authors emphasizing the "we, the observer," in the act of measuring. (p. 107) They highlight how human-created rhythmic devices like clocks are used to "count off other specific events," but these are "just events, not to be confused with time." (p. 107)
Space as a Conceptual Framework: Space is described as a human construct, "as if every conceivable object is displayed within a vast container that has no walls." (p. 113) It is presented as "of a uniquely subjective nature. They are modes of interpretation and understanding. They are part of the mental logic of the animal organism, the soft-ware that molds sensations into multidimensional objects." (p. 113) The difficulty in perceiving space in phenomena like the Northern Lights or waterfalls is attributed to the lack of learned boundaries and categories. "Because human language and ideation decides where the boundaries of one object end and another begins," (p. 114) we categorize and perceive separations.
Space as Illusory: Several points are made to support the idea that space is illusory: the Casimir effect showing that "empty" space is not empty, the variability of distances based on conditions, quantum theory's implication that distant objects may not be truly separated, and the learned nature of perceiving boundaries. "experiments in quantum entanglement since 1997 have called into question the very meaning of space and ongoing questions as to what these entangled-particle experiments mean... either... the first particle communicates its situation far faster than the speed of light... or else there really is no separation between the pair at all, appearances to the contrary." (p. 124)
Neurons as Fundamental Units: From a biocentric viewpoint, nerve cells are considered fundamental, forming the circuitry that contains the logic of space and time and embracing all that can be observed. "From a biocentric viewpoint, these nerve cells are the fundamental units of reality... Neurons—not atoms—lie as the bed-rock and base of our observer-determined world." (p. 149)
Limitations of Language and Logic in Understanding Reality: The analogy of using pliers to hammer a nail is used to illustrate how language and logic, while useful for everyday tasks, fail to adequately describe or comprehend reality at fundamental levels. "The point to all this is to instill a proper wariness for language and logic. Those are tools used for specific purposes, and work well for what they are intended to do... But every tool has uses and also limitations." (p. 138) The authors acknowledge that biocentrism may have logical limits, but this does not invalidate it, just as the inconceivable aspects of the Big Bang do not invalidate that theory. "Mystery is never disproof." (p. 140)
Energy Conservation and the Nature of Self: The law of conservation of energy is invoked to suggest the enduring nature of the self, stating that the "essence of who you are, which is energy, can neither diminish nor “go away”—there simply isn’t any “away” in which to go. We inhabit a closed system." (p. 192)
Relativity and the Observer: The appendix on relativity emphasizes that Einstein's theory, while mathematically robust, relies on the observer and the measurement of space with physical objects, a concept that becomes problematic at microscopic scales. "sufficiently microscopic measuring rods become less rigid, not more. The idea of measuring space by lining up individual atoms or electrons is absurd." (p. 202) They propose that relativity can be reformulated without assuming the a priori existence of space, focusing instead on the interaction within a "field." "this construction of distance does not require any a priori assumption of space. We merely assume the existence of field and that certain parts of it may be distinct from other parts." (p. 205)
Dreams and Schizophrenia as Evidence of Mind's Constructive Capacity: The authors offer dreams and the experiences of schizophrenic patients as examples of the mind's ability to create a spatiotemporal reality that is perceived as real. "remember that dreams and schizophrenia (consider the movie A Beautiful Mind) prove the capacity of the mind to construct a spatiotemporal reality as real as the one you are experiencing now." (p. 182)
The Inability to Observe Potential Reality: The futility of trying to observe a particle in its probabilistic state before it is observed is highlighted: "Perhaps you may find yourself trying to catch a quick glimpse of this haze of probability before it bursts into form... you can’t see something that doesn’t yet exist, so the game is futile." (p. 182)
Context-Dependent Truth: The idea that what is considered "correct" in science depends on the sophistication of the audience is presented to illustrate that our understanding of reality can have multiple "onion layers" of truth. (p. 190)